Call Us 713-357-4190

When Your Future Is On The Line

Choosing The Right Attorney Can Make All The Difference

request consultation

request a consultation

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

*All Fields Required

Texas’s Castle Doctrine: What You Need to Know

Posted in Criminal Defense on November 14, 2023

The Texas Castle Doctrine is a powerful legal tool for individuals in the state of Texas to protect themselves and their property. It is a self-defense law that grants individuals the right to use deadly force against an intruder in certain situations. 

The law allows people to defend themselves without fear of prosecution if they believe they are in danger of serious bodily harm or death. The Texas Castle Doctrine provides a layer of protection against intruders, allowing people the power to protect themselves and their loved ones from harm. If you are charged with a crime in the process of defending yourself and your home, call Mary E. Conn & Associates to help with your defense. 

When Was the Castle Doctrine Created?

Various forms of the Castle Doctrine have been around for many, many years. It has changed over time to match current thoughts about standing your ground and personal protection. The current iteration of the Texas Castle Doctrine can be traced back to 1995. The legislature in Texas changed the law so that people do not have to retreat from a conflict if they are defending their homes and the people within.

The Castle Doctrine is rooted in British Common Law and has carried over into other legal systems around the world. Common Law established the rule to retreat, which states that the victim or person under attack must retreat if at all possible until they cannot retreat anymore. It also establishes the requirement that they must prove that their life is in danger. When these two conditions are met, deadly force is allowed. 

This is the basis for all forms of the Castle Doctrine going forward. Other legal systems have adopted the practice and made changes to suit their cultures and legal systems. The US legal system has made several major changes to the Castle Doctrine over several hundred years based on needed changes and pertinent course cases. 

The Castle Doctrine establishes the guidelines for self-defense across much of the United States. The United State’s Second Amendment rights (i.e., the right to bear arms) require legislation to guide how people are allowed to use those firearms. Without a framework like the Castle Doctrine, it is much harder to tell the difference between gun violence and self-defense. 

The Castle Doctrine Still Needs Refining

While the Castle Doctrine is widely known, it does still leave problems that need to be addressed. Most of those problems are related to how the statute is applied and cases where it may be applied questionably.

In recent decades, there have been shootings that bring the Castle Doctrine into question. Here are some of the notable cases that might have led to changes in the Castle Doctrine and may show its flaws. 

Trayvon Martin 

The shooting of Trayvon Martin, a teenager shot by an adult on community watch patrol, brought the Castle Doctrine into question. The reason that this case was controversial was that Trayvon was shot not in a person’s home, which is usually where the doctrine applies. George Zimmerman, the man who shot Trayvon, was armed on a community patrol, and it was questionable if he had the authority to apply the Castle Doctrine at all. Questions also arose as to whether Zimmerman was the aggressor in the situation, which would have voided the doctrine as well. 

Ralph Yarl

Ralph Yarl is another case where the Castle Doctrine became a point of contention. Yarl was shot on the doorstep of an 84-year-old man when he went to the wrong house. The case became very controversial when it was revealed that the 84-year-old resident shot Yarl through the front door while Yarl was trying to pick up one of his siblings after school. 

In this case, the Castle Doctrine was overruled, and the man was charged with murder. Although he was in his home and did not have a responsibility to retreat, it was not established that Yarl actually posed a threat. Cases like this bring into question the application of the Castle Doctrine and how courts should apply such laws. 

Discuss Your Case With a Texas Self-Defense Lawyer

Self-defense laws are a difficult part of the law to apply correctly, and many people are confused about how it is used. If you or a loved one is involved in a self-defense case, seek the assistance of a qualified lawyer to help you navigate the legal system. 

Mary E. Conn & Associates specializes in helping people with self-defense cases that involve the Castle Doctrine. Our legal team works hard to build the best case possible for you and effectively defend your rights. Call us at (713) 357-4190 or fill out our contact form for help defending yourself in court.

CALL US TODAY 713-357-4190